Scaling up performance tests will inevitably require paying for the Cloud product, though, which is broken into a variety of pricing packages: Developer, Team, Pro, and Enterprise. You can write tests in JavaScript, then execute them on your local hardware via your command line terminal. Its open-source package includes both API and CLI tools. Grafana Labs’ K6, previously known as Load Impact, comes in two flavors. It offers one product with pricing packages tied to scalability. Like its peers, it offers real-time reporting, APM integration, and an optional on-premise agent.įlood is more comparable to LoadNinja than others on this list due to its focus on simplicity. There’s quite a bit of customization available for your tests, as you can scale users, test duration, and ramp-up time, supporting up to tens of thousands of browsers. Tests can be performed on its AWS or Azure cloud engines or on-premise via your own existing machines. Flood lets you build codeless tests through its GUI or upload a JMeter, Gatling, or Selenium script. Floodįlood, yet another one of Tricentis’s product offerings, merits its own mention. Whereas LoadRunner’s features depend on the version chosen, Tricentis’s functionality depends on what combination of platforms one opts for, each with its own pricing. Though rich in its offering of features, what you get will depend wholly on what combination of tools you acquire. It’s designed to be friendly to both the veteran tester and non-technical beginner. It boasts the ability to test a wide variety of application types and integrate with many other tools. It offers what Tricentis calls “no-code” (built via GUI) and “as-code” options for creating and scaling tests. NeoLoad is of particular relevance here as their cloud-based performance testing product. qTest handles test management and reporting, Tosca offers codeless testing for a wide range of application types, NeoLoad specializes in performance testing, Test Automation integrates with ServiceNow, Data Integrity automates data quality testing, and finally, LiveCompare produces Data Analytics. Tricentis is another very popular competitor, but its features are spread across multiple products. All features are tied to one product, whereas pricing packages are specific to scaling capacity. This more single-minded focus grants LoadNinja a simpler pricing structure. It may not be as feature-rich as other products listed here as it is more strictly focused on performance testing with a simple presentation. The solution offers local options to keep testing inside your network via a private proxy and supports integration with Jenkins, REST API, and various custom CI/CD plugins. It provides an embedded test recorder to capture web and API transactions, then allows you to do load testing at scale with customizable scenarios. LoadNinja prides itself on simplicity, claiming “anyone on your team” can load test. Related Reading: Why Enterprises Are Exploring Modern LoadRunner Alternatives > LoadNinja There’s a lot of flexibility here, but it depends on which of the five versions are chosen. In regard to load testing, LoadRunner’s site claims to support “hundreds or thousands” of concurrent virtual users. It’s billed as “continuous testing for any app”, boasting both performance and functional testing features.įeatures include integrations with both IDEs and CI/CD tools, and tests can be created by uploading an existing script, building a scenario within the UI, or recording user actions. It comes in five versions: Professional, Enterprise, Cloud, Developer, and the free Community Edition. LoadRunner, a former HP product now owned by MicroFocus (and being acquired by OpenText), is a well-known name in the testing world and.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |